Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Suspended Ceiling
|
Re: Suspended Ceiling
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 9:52 GMT updated: 15 May 2008 at 9:56 GMT
|
go to thread
|
vrthree said: Why would you only take one image at 60-65 degrees? What does this achieve?
It is enough to give good zenith coverage and (at this angle rather than +90 degrees) is more likely to provide a link to the main row to ensure easy stitching in a situation where a +90 degrees zenith shot might be featureless (for example, a plain blue sky or a white ceiling).
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
HDR vs EV results in PTGui / Lens hood on Nikkor 10.5
|
Re: HDR vs EV results in PTGui / Lens hood on Nikkor 10.5
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 7:59 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Hamish Tear said: Sorry Mediavets,
There's one thing there I don't quite understand - when you say 'and one up at about +60-65 degrees' - does this mean one shot or one row? If one shot - I don't get it.
Thanks,
Hamish.
One shot at +60-65 degrees - instead of a zenith shot at +90 degrees.
Why? because if the zenith is, say, a featureless blue sky or a featureless interior ceiling, this technique is more likely to enable an easy stitch because you will be very likely to get overlapping features between the up shot and the main row shots. You will still get excellent coverage of the zenith.
Wroks well for me.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Suspended Ceiling
|
Re: Suspended Ceiling
Posted: 14 May 2008 at 22:02 GMT
|
go to thread
|
vrthree said: Any one got any hints or tricks on how to stitch panos with suspended ceiling? I am using a 10.5mm lens (6 images + zenith) and PTGui to stitch.
Many thanks
If the problem is that the zenith image lacks features to place control points then you might try a different shooting technique.
As suggested by Hans N - when using my DX sensor DSLR with the Nikkor 10.5mm and NN5 pano head, I shoot 6-around at about -10 degrees and 1 up at +60-65 degrees. That give sgood zenitn coverage and also usually provides a good link between the main row and the 'zenith' shot - leaving just a small hole at the nadir.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Canon EOS 40D & Fisheye 8mm f/3.5 EX DG Users
|
Re: Canon EOS 40D & Fisheye 8mm f/3.5 EX DG Users
Posted: 14 May 2008 at 15:06 GMT updated: 14 May 2008 at 15:08 GMT
|
go to thread
|
enbilaman said: Hi Hans,
Optimized FOV is not always the right FOV. Yes, I have observed the same. But the panorama may be seemingly good and complete even with a too small reported FOV for instance, and this puzzles me. There must be some image correction parameters that are activated but not reported.
Yes, agreed. I got good 360x180 coverage, and excellent stitch and render, with APP 1.4.2, with the image set when FOV is reported as 164.962 degrees and focal length as 10.34mm in the Move Images mode data table. Manually setting FOV to 180 produced a much inferior result.
Hmmmm........
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Canon EOS 40D & Fisheye 8mm f/3.5 EX DG Users
|
Re: Canon EOS 40D & Fisheye 8mm f/3.5 EX DG Users
Posted: 14 May 2008 at 14:16 GMT updated: 14 May 2008 at 14:25 GMT
|
go to thread
|
mhc1 said: Andrew: this I can not prove: my Autopano (V1.4) has no holes when slanted. I´ll give it another try and report later. But me and another felow stitched it with the mentioned method in Autopano: no zenith hole and no nadir hole. Which was expected to be. Talking about slanted images though.
You (and John H and Hans N) are right - I was just too careless about checking the default circle crop - I hadn't adjusted it! - with just a little adjustment of the FE crop it stitches just fine in APP v1.4.2 with no zenith or nadir holes - although blending at zenith was not great using Smartblend(which is what I would expect).
When I shoot with a Nikon DX sensor camera and Sigma 8mm on my NN5 head I usually shoot 4 or 6 around at +5 degrees. This gives good (better) zenith coverage, stitches easily, is simpler to level and the nadir hole is no larger than the rotator of my NN5 pano head, which is neither here nor there whether or not one chooses to edit the nadir.
The only 'point' I can see for a slanting technique would be to obtain 360x180 coverage in just three shots (rather than your 4 shots) which is what the Agno's MrotatorC head () which provides both slant and tilt was designed to achieve by Luca. He says you can do it with their RingTS8 head too as the ring has a 60 degree slant marking and the plastic 'liner' in the metal ring allows you to set a small tilt.
It seems to me there are simpler techniques if one is going to take 4 (or more) shots.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Canon EOS 40D & Fisheye 8mm f/3.5 EX DG Users
|
Re: Canon EOS 40D & Fisheye 8mm f/3.5 EX DG Users
Posted: 14 May 2008 at 11:52 GMT updated: 14 May 2008 at 11:53 GMT
|
go to thread
|
mhc1 said: 3. Slanted and levelled. means 60° slanted and tripod & camera levelled www.netzserver1.de/ptgroup/40DS8-slanted-levelled... No nadir and no zenith hole. More slant-info on the Agnos webside tinyurl.com/48k7mb
ciao mike www.360de.de
There are both zenitn and nadir holes when I stitched this set with Autopano Pro. Which is what I would have expected using Canon cropped sensor and Sigma 8mm.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
HDR vs EV results in PTGui / Lens hood on Nikkor 10.5
|
Re: HDR vs EV results in PTGui / Lens hood on Nikkor 10.5
Posted: 14 May 2008 at 8:11 GMT updated: 14 May 2008 at 8:33 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Hamish Tear said: Thanks to you and Mediavets for your responses - I figured as much. I used to shoot with a Nikon D80 and a Sigma 8mm, so am used to the 'partial circular image' but have now switched to D300 and Nikkor 10.5. Anyway - is there any advantage to shaving off the lens hood - better stitching overlap, perhaps?
Hamish.
No, there is no advantage to be gained from shaving off the lens hood when using the Nikkor 10.5mm FE on a DX sensor Nikon DSLR like the D300.
Overlap for stitching is determined by settings of the click stops on you pano head and shooting technique.
For 360x180 panos using a DX sensor 6MP D40 and the Nikkor 10.5mm FE with an NN5 pano head. Manual focus (this lens doesn't autofocus on the D40 anyway), manual exposure, and preferably custom WB, I shoot 6 around at about -10 degress and one up at about +60-65 degrees. This leaves a small nadir 'hole' about the size of the rotator of the NN5 head and provides a good link between the main row and the 'zenith' shot.
These image sets stitch very easily and well with AutoPano Pro with automatic CP detection (I seldom need to adust CPs automatically detected), and rendering with spline36 interpolator and Smartblend at 8000x4000 pixels.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
|
Re: Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
Posted: 13 May 2008 at 23:26 GMT updated: 13 May 2008 at 23:27 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Steven Scott said: Also .... I tend to think an SLR is not a "serious SLR" unless it has Exposure Bracketing. Even the new Nikon D60 does NOT have EB.
True - D40, D40X and D60 lack AEB - but AEB capability of many DSLRs is too limited to be of real value when shooting bracketed interior panos.
I look forward to seeing a 360x180 pano shot with a G9 with a fisheye convertor.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
|
Re: Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
Posted: 13 May 2008 at 20:35 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Steve
Steven Scott said: We sell the Canon G9 for $499.00US and the D40x One Lens Kit (18-55mm) is $729.00 US. So not exactly the same. The Canon G9 is 12MP, with three-shot AEB and is light-weight. The downside is you can't buy interchangeable lenses.
Mahalo, Steve
Note I said the D40 not the D40X - prices from a major UK retailer are £329.99 for the G9 and £289.99 for the D40 with 18-55mm kit lens, and Canon 400D with kit lens at £373.99.
The 'benefit' of a 12MP compact over a 6MP DSLR is of limited value for spherical pano shooting even if one can find a suitable FE convertor for the compact.
I can assure you that my 6MP D40 plus the Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE on my NN5 pano head produces much better quality spherical panos than my 12MP Nikon P5100 plus the Nikon FC-E8 FE convertor on a Bophoto bracket.
But of course the P5100/FC-E8 combo/Bophoto bracket on a monopod is smaller, and lighter and more discreet which is why I have it - for 'casual/snapshot' style spherical panos.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
|
Re: Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
Posted: 13 May 2008 at 18:34 GMT updated: 13 May 2008 at 18:34 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Jo and Tom said: It appears from the Raynox website that they have lens adapters for most cameras, and so now I am also thinking of a Canon Powershot G9 with one of their FE and WA lenses. I know that the general feeling on this site is that the Canon sensors are generally better than the the Nikon. Would that be true of the Powershot G9 ?
What are peoples views on the above combination.
Tom
Aside from the fact that Raynox FE convertors will not produce a good quality image it appears that the Canon G9 compact costs as much as a Nikon D40 DSLR with kit lens. I'd take the D40 over the Canon G9 any day, and shell out for Sigma or Nikon FE.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
|
Re: Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
Posted: 13 May 2008 at 18:27 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Steven Scott said: I've been wondering the same..... so thanks to all. I am using a Canon G9 with the Canon wide angle and a Panosaurus. Not ideal. I know. I'm trying to learn and get my skills down before I buy the new Canon XSi (450) with the Sigma 8mm or 10mm lens.
The Hawaiian 'isles offer some great "pano moments" and I'm trying to learn. If anyone knows of a great lens for the G9, please let us all know! The Canon G9 is a great point-and-shoot camera.
Mahalo
Apparently the G7 can be used with the Nikon FC-E9 FE convertor - don't know about the G9.
www.bophoto.com/bracket/camera-solutions/canon-G7...
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
|
Re: Raynox DCR-FE 180 PRO ??
Posted: 13 May 2008 at 11:50 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Jo and Tom said: Hi there,
Have any of you guys got experience of the Raynox FE in comparison to the Sigma 8mm and the Nikon 10.5mm ? Is the quality of image as good ? Their DCR-FE 180 PRO has a 180 degree diagonal FOV. Tom
The Raynox FE covertor is not as good as the FC-E8/9 let alone the Sigma 8mm or Nikkor 10.5mm FEs.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Tips & Tricks
Thread:
high res panormaic shots ?? Help!
|
Re: high res panoramicc shots ?? Help!
Posted: 13 May 2008 at 10:48 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Hans Nyberg said: This one has movement in both directions and there is no areas without people moving. This is the most difficult you can do. www.panoramas.dk/new/fullscreen16.html
Hans
Was this shot using a pole? The viewpoint seems quite elevated.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
HDR vs EV results in PTGui / Lens hood on Nikkor 10.5
|
Re: HDR vs EV results in PTGui / Lens hood on Nikkor 10.5
Posted: 12 May 2008 at 19:13 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Hamish Tear said: Also - I've seen stuff on the internet about cutting off the small lens hood on the Nikkor 10.5mm lens. What's that all about?
Thanks,
That's about getting a full circular image on a fullframe DSLR - typically the Canon 5D with an adapter.
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum: Q & A
Thread:
Newbie and complete novice.
|
Re: Newbie and complete novice.
Posted: 12 May 2008 at 14:52 GMT updated: 12 May 2008 at 14:54 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Michel
enbilaman said: BTW: Three months after order, I am still waiting for the delivery from Nikon of the UR-E20 adapter to perform the same experiment Could somebody measure the length of this Nikon genuine accessory (with about +/-0.3 mm accuracy or better) and then report the result?
Regards,
Michel
I reckon it is 32.2mm.
That is from rearmost surface to top of the 'ridge' around the front thread.
Is that 'good' or 'bad'?
Andrew
|
|
alert moderator
|
|