Forum/thread	Message
Forum: Q & A Thread: Feet in panorama	Re: Feet in panorama Posted: 24 Nov 2008 at 17:31 GMT go to thread Glad you got the Baywatch reference Doug I'll give the suggestions for parallax correction and feet removal a go, see if I can make it almost perfect. I'm still pleased with the way it came out, HDR handheld and not too shabby. John, what kind of projection would you like to see? alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Feet in panorama	Feet in panorama Posted: 24 Nov 2008 at 0:57 GMT go to thread Maybe it is just me, but it always makes me laugh when I get my feet caught in a panorama Taken in Baywatch land: www.v360r.com/temp/nov2008/baywatch-hdr.html PS This was taken handheld. alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Stitch Speed Test on different machines	Re: Stitch Speed Test on different machines Posted: 15 Nov 2008 at 15:33 GMT go to thread Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz (laptop) 4GB RAM 1TB MyBook 7200RPM on E-SATA interface 46 seconds Time to stop testing and actually make some panoramas :P alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Stitch Speed Test on different machines	Re: Stitch Speed Test on different machines Posted: 14 Nov 2008 at 22:51 GMT go to thread What software do you expect to use for this Mauro? alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Photoshop CS4 & 360° Panoramas	Re: Photoshop CS4 & 360° Panoramas Posted: 14 Nov 2008 at 22:50 GMT go to thread I've had Photoshop CS4 for a week and it has been good so far. The biggest improvement is a few pixels saved at the top with a custom menu bar that is still responsive. Also, tabs for open documents (like web browser tabs) are great. The 3D things don't interest me much... they were pretty useless for editing panoramas I made with PTGUI which is something I would have liked... you can paint 3D objects and I wanted to be able to edit from inside a panorama. alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Stitch Speed Test on different machines	Re: Stitch Speed Test on different machines Posted: 13 Nov 2008 at 23:24 GMT go to thread Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz (laptop) 4GB RAM 16GB Sandisk SXS SSD 46 seconds So worth spending $2500 to be 2 seconds faster than the old one (not) alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Fresh eyes needed to examine PTViewer html	Re: Fresh eyes needed to examine PTViewer html Posted: 10 Oct 2008 at 22:48 GMT go to thread I believe you are missing this param: <param name=file value=xxx> P.S. Both of the links you posted didn't work for me (PC, Firefox 3) alert moderator
Forum: Tips & Tricks Thread: Gigapan-Roboter	Re: Gigapan-Roboter Posted: 10 Oct 2008 at 20:21 GMT go to thread Thanks! alert moderator
Forum: Tips & Tricks Thread: Gigapan-Roboter	Re: Gigapan-Roboter Posted: 10 Oct 2008 at 16:45 GMT go to thread I got a message last night inviting me to buy a Beta Gigapan unit for around $400... not sure whether to go for it. It can only use compact cameras like Canon Ixus (I have one but would rather use an SLR). I also doubt it can do full 360's including the floor. Any ideas? alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Nikon FOV	Re: Nikon FOV Posted: 27 Sep 2008 at 7:53 GMT go to thread Thanks for the answers everyone. alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Nikon FOV	Nikon FOV Posted: 25 Sep 2008 at 23:26 GMT go to thread Easy question! Does the Sigma 8mm and Peleng 8mm have the same field of view as the Nikon 10.5mm? alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: What is better Nikon 10.5 or Sigma 8?	Re: What is better Nikon 10.5 or Sigma 8? Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 20:04 GMT go to thread Don't forget the Peleng! alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: Photoshop CS4 & 360° Panoramas	Re: Photoshop CS4 & 360° Panoramas Posted: 9 Sep 2008 at 20:53 GMT go to thread Being able to edit panoramas 'live' will be very welcome. Every Tom, Dick and Harry thinking they know how to take fantastic panoramas probably won't alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: high quality, what quality with what Focal length	Re: high quality, what quality with what Focal length Posted: 1 Sep 2008 at 21:12 GMT go to thread For your info., the messy unfinished 'gigapixel' panorama I posted is 181MB on the server. alert moderator
Forum: Q & A Thread: high quality, what quality with what Focal length	Re: high quality, what quality with what Focal length Posted: 1 Sep 2008 at 21:08 GMT go to thread I wouldn't bother with super-high resolution unless you have a very good subject. This took around 350GB of temporary disk space, and it is only partial. You can however really zoom in: www.v360r.com/temp/gigatest_sphere/gigatest_spher... alert moderator