Forum:
Tips & Tricks
Thread:
Just found a feature in PTGui I never used before
|
Re: Just found a feature in PTGui I never used before
Posted: 1 May 2010 at 12:27 GMT
|
go to thread
|
pretty cool stuff! thanks for sharing!
I'm learning like every day by reading the forums, awesome.
regards
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
is it possible with these tools?
|
Re: is it possible with these tools?
Posted: 12 Apr 2010 at 20:27 GMT
|
go to thread
|
I recently bought the 10.5 Nikon, it's an amazing lens. As said earlier, without panohead it's nearly impossible to make a decent hires pano. (unless you're in the middle of the grand canyon  )
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
FYI - Even the BBC has gone panoramic
|
Re: FYI - Even the BBC has gone panoramic
Posted: 12 Apr 2010 at 20:20 GMT
|
go to thread
|
|
They do it using javascript, nothing fancy IMHO. Nice though.
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
Content-Aware Fill in Photoshop
|
Re: Content-Aware Fill in Photoshop
Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 15:25 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Now that is pretty amazing stuff! thanks for pointing us to that article,
regards
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
|
Re: NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 15:03 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Thanks guys. I need to get used to all the functionality of PTGui, there's more than I thought. I know my way in PS but that alone ain't enough to make perfect pano's.
I find that the technical articles in the documentation of PTGui is hard to understand for me since english isn't my native language.
regards,
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
|
Re: NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 9:52 GMT
|
go to thread
|
The upper is now set at 87,5 mm and this seems to be the exact point. Since accuracy seems to be so amazingly important (I have the feeling only parts of a mil already shows parallax error) I think it may be wise to glue the rubber plate to the arm, or even the whole camera
regards
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
|
Re: NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
Posted: 27 Mar 2010 at 22:21 GMT
|
go to thread
|
OSP found! I was pretty much near where it should be, it's at 51MM.
Tomorrow further testing to find the optimal setting for the upper rail assembly
regards
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
|
Re: NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
Posted: 27 Mar 2010 at 19:28 GMT
updated: 27 Mar 2010 at 19:29 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Smooth, you're an artist man! Thanks for the tips, I'll try out your tutorial for finding the OSP.
What you see in the images, is my upper rail setting of 86mm OK? or does that on, with the given combo needs adjustment as well?
Also, I will try shooting 6 shots at -10, 2 at 65 up (easier on the skyshot ain't it?) and a nadir.
I saw an article on removing tripod shadows somewhere too, thats the cream on the pudding I guess.
Thanks!
regards
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
|
Re: NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
Posted: 27 Mar 2010 at 17:37 GMT
|
go to thread
|
It does have a rubber block, yes no camera plate. I have bought it used though.
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
|
NN3 / D300 / 10.5 Nikon troubles
Posted: 27 Mar 2010 at 17:10 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Hello,
Can anyone with this combo help me out on this one.
I have just bought the 10.5 Fisheye from Nikon. Having read several articles around the forums about Nodal point settings for the NN3 I'm a bit lost. (Im a newbie to pano photography). NN's website states 55mm lower rail but this seems too much! Having adjusted to 50 mm it looks to be fine.
Upper rail is set at(?), looks like 86:
Also some websites state that the NP is just behind the golden ring on this lens so it looks ok?:
Still I'm having troubles with parralax please look at this image.
I uploaded my image set, for review. Maybe I am overlooking something here I really don't know. Thanks in advance.
www.monkeylectric.nl/panoforum.zip
regards,
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
Nikon 10.5 Fisheye, wise decision?
|
Re: Nikon 10.5 Fisheye, wise decision?
Posted: 25 Mar 2010 at 8:00 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Thanks all for the feedback,
I have bought the Nikon, it's on its way
Will let you guys know how it performs on my D300
regards,
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
Nikon 10.5 Fisheye, wise decision?
|
Nikon 10.5 Fisheye, wise decision?
Posted: 24 Mar 2010 at 13:19 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Hi All,
Maybe other Pano enthausiasts can enlighten me a little
Owning a 10-20 Sigma DG lens, would it be, qualitywise, a good switch tto a Nikon 10,5 Fisheye lens?
Will panorama's from the Nikon be any better in any way than the 10-20?
I can buy one used but don't know whether it is worth the switch..
regards,
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
NN3 D300 17-55AFS-DX 2.8
|
Re: NN3 D300 17-55AFS-DX 2.8
Posted: 23 Mar 2010 at 8:19 GMT
|
go to thread
|
I was afraid that this was the case, looking at the size of that lens/camera setup.
It would be a killer setup since that lens is amazingly sharp on my D300.
Guess I'll have to stick with my 10-20 sigma for now ;-(
Thanks anyway!
regards,
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
NN3 D300 17-55AFS-DX 2.8
|
NN3 D300 17-55AFS-DX 2.8
Posted: 22 Mar 2010 at 18:49 GMT
|
go to thread
|
Hello all,
I'm looking for the settings for the above combo (at 17mm).
Anyone tried this already? I couldn't find info on nodal ninja's website.
regards,
Henk
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
