Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
New to forum, question abt. tourweaver
|
Re: New to forum, question abt. tourweaver
Posted: 7 Jul 2009 at 23:23 GMT
|
go to thread
|
iam360Texas said: Well your loading time is actually controlled by your file size [1.5 - 2mb]; your internet server access; and internet congestion factor.
Thanks for the help. My file size is on average about 800 kbs. However, the flash players load that same size file about 3 times as fast (using the same internet, congestion, and stuff). That is why I wanted to switch over to Flash players or figure out a way to make Tourweaver load the files faster. The latest version of tourwever is better, but still a good bit slower. I do not know what unilaterally recompression is. Again thank you for the suggestions.
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Forum:
Q & A
Thread:
New to forum, question abt. tourweaver
|
New to forum, question abt. tourweaver
Posted: 7 Jul 2009 at 21:09 GMT
|
go to thread
|
|
Hello all. I have been reading the forum for a few months, and it has saved me a ton of time. Thanks to everyone that contributes information. I use tourweaver to produce my tours, and I like the features. However, my loading time is a good bit more that tours produced in FPP, Pano2vr, and krpano. I have bought and tried a few of these programs. I know next to nothing about html coding, though. Pano2vr is easier to use, but the tours do not look as "professional" or "branded". I use PTgui to stitch my pictures. I have played with it and gotten them to about 700-950 kbs. This is at 4000 by 2000 pixels and 75 percent quality. This picture takes about 15 seconds to load on a site produced by tourweaver, and about 5 seconds to load on a site produced by Pano2vr. Any suggetions would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
