Eric_Rougier
Posts: 63
Location: Paris, France
Registered: 17 Sep 2005
|
|
Eric_Rougier
Posts: 63
Location: Paris, France
Registered: 17 Sep 2005
|
|
revmark
Posts: 54
Location: Harvey, United States
Registered: 22 Feb 2006
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 11 Jul 2006 at 0:34 GMT
|
|
|
How about posting the unpatched pano. Thanks.
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Eric_Rougier
Posts: 63
Location: Paris, France
Registered: 17 Sep 2005
|
|
Hans Nyberg
Posts: 866
Location: Denmark
Registered: 28 Aug 2005
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 11 Jul 2006 at 9:24 GMT
|
|
Hey Eric
Stealing my ideas. 
Thats how I done it since I got the 10,5mm. But on my Canon 20d I can only use -7 degrees.
However my 5D is perfect as it gives me 140degrees ( more than 10,5 on Nikon)
I use -10 degrees with the 15mm Canon and get enough to see the edge of my Manfrotto rotator.
Here is an illustration on the overlap on a D200.
PTGui ?? Have you got a new MacBookPro
Hans
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Eric_Rougier
Posts: 63
Location: Paris, France
Registered: 17 Sep 2005
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 11 Jul 2006 at 10:07 GMT
|
|
Yooo Hans !
Yep' sharing is good for karma and the pano community.
It's so boring to patch the nadir...and more to patch a BIG hole !
Now, I'm waiting for the next pano head genearation: anti gravity and invisible. (Manfrotto Star Trek VR head  )
Your graph' is nice.
No, just a small and fast MacBook, it's enough for me, to keep the best tools from the OSX world and from the Windows world.
It's cool, no ?
And you, did you change your PB17" ?
Eric (wold cup loser)
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Hans Nyberg
Posts: 866
Location: Denmark
Registered: 28 Aug 2005
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 11 Jul 2006 at 10:33 GMT
|
|
Eric_Rougier said: Yooo Hans !
It's so boring to patch the nadir...and more to patch a BIG hole !
Tell that to Matt
I just started to include my nadir in the main stitch.
How?
Discovered an unknown feature of PTMac.
Alpha channels on source images works.
And you, did you change your PB17" ?
Eric (wold cup loser)
SOON
Hans
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Eric_Rougier
Posts: 63
Location: Paris, France
Registered: 17 Sep 2005
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 11 Jul 2006 at 11:04 GMT
updated: 11 Jul 2006 at 11:06 GMT
|
|
>Tell that to Matt
I did 
>I just started to include my nadir in the main stitch.
>Discovered an unknown feature of PTMac.
>Alpha channels on source images works.
Héhé... soon also, but with Stitcher (gna gna)
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Nicolas Fonallaz
Posts: 1
Location:
Registered: 12 Jul 2006
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 12 Jul 2006 at 15:12 GMT
|
|
Eric,
Stitcher Unlimited = Stitcher 5.5 ?
Does it accept fisheye directly ? and 8mm ?
Drumzz
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Eric_Rougier
Posts: 63
Location: Paris, France
Registered: 17 Sep 2005
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 12 Jul 2006 at 17:49 GMT
updated: 12 Jul 2006 at 17:53 GMT
|
|
Yes, until now, for me, it the only way I found to stitch automatically my Canon5D / 10.5mm picts. (3 + 0 + 0  )
For the 8mm and all other fisheyes, I think too without "defish".
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
jconly
Posts: 5
Location:
Registered: 12 Jul 2006
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 12 Jul 2006 at 18:19 GMT
|
|
Eric,
Where did/how did you get a copy of Stitcher Unlimited?
I did not think it was released yet?
Justin
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
rez
Posts: 7
Location: United States
Registered: 8 Jul 2006
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 12 Jul 2006 at 19:48 GMT
updated: 12 Jul 2006 at 19:48 GMT
|
|
|
Ha, that was my question. Are you a beta tester? I can't wait to try that prog. Is there date?
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
enbilaman
Posts: 73
Location:
Registered: 3 Mar 2006
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 12 Jul 2006 at 20:07 GMT
|
|
Hi Eric;
I am currently investigating by thorough experimentation if PTGUI does better than Stitcher 5.5 (or vice-versa) in automatically stitching three images in portrait mode from the (EOS 5D+ Nikkor 10,5mm) combo.
At this moment, after two days of hard work, I could not yet decide which one is actually the best. They both do that great!
Michel
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Eric_Rougier
Posts: 63
Location: Paris, France
Registered: 17 Sep 2005
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 12 Jul 2006 at 21:28 GMT
|
|
- Justin / Rez : yes beta test for Stitcher 5.5 U.
- Hi Genius Master Michel,
I was also trying with PTGUI with different lines arguments for the Autopano in plugin or cropping some images parts ...bla bla...but all my zenith was always ugly. Sometimes I was better with a Canon Mark II DS but never perfect. boring :- (
Today, ST55 does the job it's ok for me...
Did you find an Autopano magic formula or an other idea ?
Anyone ?
Do you have the same problems on the extrem zenith points ?
Eric (hate patching my nadirs and hate the manual points)
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Bravo
Posts: 213
Location: Athens, Greece
Registered: 28 Jan 2005
|
Re: A smaller 'hole' on the nadir = less work in Photoshop
Posted: 13 Jul 2006 at 21:32 GMT
updated: 13 Jul 2006 at 21:33 GMT
|
|
I figured out a way to get a perfect nadir with no patching at all
tinyurl.com/gy2br
Yiorgos
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
back to threads list |
this thread is closed
Prev
