Forum: Q & A

Thread: The next breakthrough in panoramic photography

back to threads list | this thread is closed
Search the forums:
Author  Message 
Mark Houston

Posts: 138
Location: Ferndale, Michigan, United States
Registered: 23 Aug 2005
The next breakthrough in panoramic photography
Posted: 14 Oct 2011 at 1:04 GMT
The throwable panorama camera ball
www.petapixel.com/2011/10/13/ball-camera-captures...°-panoramas-when-tossed-into-the-air/#more-38349
alert moderator
Philip Warner

Posts: 110
Location: Round Rock, TX, United States
Registered: 14 Mar 2008
Re: The next breakthrough in panoramic photography
Posted: 14 Oct 2011 at 2:23 GMT
Brilliant! The image quality isn't that bad for a prototype.

Phil
alert moderator
No One

Posts: 501
Location: Sri Lanka
Registered: 14 May 2004
Re: The next breakthrough in panoramic photography
Posted: 14 Oct 2011 at 2:43 GMT
Haaaa!

That is funny, very cool, thanks Mark.

Guess now we need a 360 camera ball canon for aerial 360's

smile

Robert
alert moderator
chillman

Posts: 9
Location: Aachen, Germany
Registered: 17 Sep 2011
Re: The next breakthrough in panoramic photography
Posted: 14 Oct 2011 at 6:18 GMT
I think it is a very creative idea with a lot of potential. One thing confuses me though, why are they using 36 camera modules? I think they would get much better resulting doing it like the DIY Streetview guys, positioning fisheye cams in the sides of a cube. I guess the stitching would be a lot better that way.
alert moderator
PinoyMarc

Posts: 37
Location: Tampa, United States
Registered: 15 Nov 2010
Re: The next breakthrough in panoramic photography
Posted: 15 Oct 2011 at 10:49 GMT
I was just going to post about this topic.

I like the idea of minimizing the amount from 36 cameras to just maybe 4 fisheye lens, but I am guessing they did that because of the cost. Fish eyes cost more?
alert moderator
Jaime

Posts: 30
Location: Elche, Spain
Registered: 14 Sep 2011
Re: The next breakthrough in panoramic photography
Posted: 15 Oct 2011 at 11:19 GMT

PinoyMarc said:

I was just going to post about this topic.

I like the idea of minimizing the amount from 36 cameras to just maybe 4 fisheye lens, but I am guessing they did that because of the cost. Fish eyes cost more?

Fish eyes cost more, but too they must be more exposed to damage, 36 cheap cameras can cost less that 6 best cameras with fisheyes, it could be done with the Gopro.
alert moderator
Tactus 360

Posts: 1245
Location: Tynset, Norway
Registered: 2 Sep 2010
Re: The next breakthrough in panoramic photography
Posted: 15 Oct 2011 at 17:29 GMT
Clever concept, but it will only be used to look over the neighbour's fence... I hope... A neutral-coloured case might diminish the green colour cast, but I hope they don't think of that; there are already too many competitors who think they can take panoramas with no equipment or skill around already without adding to the problem.

Jon
alert moderator
Clay

Posts: 251
Location: Port Colborne, Ontario, Canada
Registered: 23 Aug 2004
Re: The next breakthrough in panoramic photography
Posted: 16 Oct 2011 at 0:25 GMT

Tactus 360 said:

there are already too many competitors who think they can take panoramas with no equipment or skill around already

Jon


Its only a matter of time before they will be right. wink
alert moderator