Forum: Galleries

Thread: HDR Feedback Appreciated...

back to threads list | this thread is closed
Search the forums:
Author  Message 
David Marine

Posts: 37
Location: Austin, TX, United States
Registered: 24 Dec 2006
HDR Feedback Appreciated...
Posted: 8 Nov 2007 at 19:10 GMT
I have long been using the HDR technique when creating my panos and always try to achieve a realistic effect.

I'd appreciate feedback on whether I met this goal with my latest work:

www.vrroadtrip.com/texas/bastropSP/4/pano.html

As always, thanks!

- David
alert moderator
gus

Posts: 385
Location: United Kingdom
Registered: 19 Jun 2007
Re: HDR Feedback Appreciated...
Posted: 8 Nov 2007 at 19:52 GMT
David,
Lovely blue skies, looks very realistic.
And you did a good job to place the tripod strategically to avoid shadows.
Took long to download though, 4.7mb is bit bigger than I would want to put online personally.....

Nice work!
alert moderator
Scott Dreslinski

Posts: 57
Location: Rochester Hills, MI, United States
Registered: 30 Jan 2007
Re: HDR Feedback Appreciated...
Posted: 8 Nov 2007 at 20:15 GMT
I like it David.

What is your HDR technique?

ptgui pro? Photomatrix?

Blend, then stitch, or stitch, then blend?

-2 to +2??

Thanks,

Scott
alert moderator
David Marine

Posts: 37
Location: Austin, TX, United States
Registered: 24 Dec 2006
Re: HDR Feedback Appreciated...
Posted: 8 Nov 2007 at 20:54 GMT
Thank you!

I've had to work hard to control my impulse to over use HDR. I think many of my older panos on the same site are a wee bit over the line. One problem I run into is my laptop's LCD panel is a bit undersaturated, leading me to create panos that are oversaturated on most other displays.

I use three bracketed exposures (-1/0/+1) and Photomatix first to create the HDR tone-mapped images, which I then stitch with PTGui.

- David
alert moderator
David Marine

Posts: 37
Location: Austin, TX, United States
Registered: 24 Dec 2006
Re: HDR Feedback Appreciated...
Posted: 8 Nov 2007 at 21:00 GMT
Thanks for the feedback!

I agree 4.7mb is too large. I should have paid better attention to the size. It's all the fine detail in the rocks and pine needles that bumps the size up even though I used the same compression levels which produced smaller panos with less detail.

- David
alert moderator