Andrey Ilyin
Posts: 565
Location: Moscow,
Registered: 8 Dec 2004
|
|
David Locke
Posts: 283
Location: San Antonio, Texas, United States
Registered: 12 May 2004
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 15 Nov 2005 at 0:51 GMT
|
|
foiled again! I try to find the tinsy bit of flaws in your shots...I cannot! great job, and it's a paying gig, I assume? good for you!
David
www.VirtualBigBend.com
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Bravo
Posts: 213
Location: Athens, Greece
Registered: 28 Jan 2005
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 15 Nov 2005 at 1:30 GMT
|
|
Horrible work as usual Andrey 
Do you prefer open diaphragm vs higher ISO in places like this? And btw, is this with the new head?
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Algenon
Posts: 135
Location: Australia
Registered: 29 Jun 2004
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 15 Nov 2005 at 2:03 GMT
|
|
I think that Andrey is starting to get the hang of this!
Algenon
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Andrey Ilyin
Posts: 565
Location: Moscow,
Registered: 8 Dec 2004
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 15 Nov 2005 at 23:02 GMT
|
|
Thank you, mates
This pano is shot with my new head - 360p. I would be capable to produce the same quality pano even with my old self made pano head, but after some (long) time in PS. This pano required half an hour, maybe 40 minutes - thanks to Matt and Stu. And I didn't have time yest to prepare the templates!!! I need one free week to make it and the new era will start for me 
Bravo,
I think that D70 (and Canon 20D) can prodeuce great material for panos up to ISO 800... With f/4 and 1/30 it is possible to capture almost any action. But I prefer to keep diafragm at 5,6 if the conditions lets me.
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
rudders
Posts: 391
Location: North Yorkshire & Northern England, United Kingdom
Registered: 21 Aug 2005
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 15 Nov 2005 at 23:20 GMT
|
|
YEY i found a stitching error in one of andreys panos at last! Its on one of the steel beams about 0.00000000005mm wide! lol  keep up the impeccable work mate!
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
maddison lake
Posts: 4
Location:
Registered: 14 Nov 2005
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 16 Nov 2005 at 7:39 GMT
|
|
Awesome work! BTW what equipment were you using?
-Maddison
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Andrey Ilyin
Posts: 565
Location: Moscow,
Registered: 8 Dec 2004
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 16 Nov 2005 at 15:33 GMT
|
|
rudders, thank you very much - the comments from knowing people worth a lot!
Maddison thank you, i use my usual setup - Nikon D70 + nikkor 10,5 + new 360p head (360precision.com) + PTGui 5.5 + Pano2QTVR
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
michael przewrocki
Posts: 734
Location: basel, Switzerland
Registered: 19 Nov 2004
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 16 Nov 2005 at 17:38 GMT
|
|
|
maybe with new scantech voyager(multilens) filmcamera one can work quicker and better. wouldnt 20mm on 43mm image-height be enough? 20- 105mm nikon-lenses. i only hope they can be focused. i dont have doubts. i am trusting gildas. i have only doubts about the lens-quality. i hope there are some top-lenses. scanning with epson 4990 and you can also get better prints. if gildas will control slit-quality(very sharp and good light-absorbation) then we could expect something special. i am dreaming of a zeiss(contx/yashica)-version. 21-100mm- there are no better lenses then these two.
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
michael przewrocki
Posts: 734
Location: basel, Switzerland
Registered: 19 Nov 2004
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 16 Nov 2005 at 18:05 GMT
|
|
|
on scantech-site 28mm lens produces 52mm image. comparing this in new multilens-camera with 35mm-camera(vertical) 20mm will equal 13.5mm lens. isnt this enough? ok looking down is not possible like in andreys wonderful shot. i am remembering back 20 years when i had to shoot with horizont and 1/30 with highspeed-film. endless amount of troubles for quality control in that fixfocus-camera with 28mm lens. i had made the prints myself.
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
michael przewrocki
Posts: 734
Location: basel, Switzerland
Registered: 19 Nov 2004
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 17 Nov 2005 at 20:08 GMT
|
|
|
this shot reminds of something i did not see quite often these months: THE BED!
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Andrey Ilyin
Posts: 565
Location: Moscow,
Registered: 8 Dec 2004
|
|
bigdaystudio
Posts: 36
Location: singapore,
Registered: 7 Sep 2005
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 20 Nov 2005 at 2:32 GMT
|
|
Hi Andrey,
would like to know do you use a ballhead to attached to the 360p panohead? or do you use other more sturdy heady to attached it? I am using a giotto ballhead and the bubble seems to run slightly while i rotate.. your advice would be really helpful.
Many thanks
ys
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Andrey Ilyin
Posts: 565
Location: Moscow,
Registered: 8 Dec 2004
|
Re: some boring sfuff
Posted: 20 Nov 2005 at 7:18 GMT
|
|
Hi Ys,
Throu the ballhead away! You don't need it - every extra mediator between the tripod and panohead is a source of error. If you feel that it is vitally necessary to level your head - use 055 manfrotto with the central column which lets the level to be slighlty adjusted (up to 5 degrees, if I'm not mistaken, what is enough) Don't remember the exact name of this item, but it is easy to find in Manfrotto catalogue.
Hope it helps.
Andrey
|
|
alert moderator
|
|
Andrey Ilyin
Posts: 565
Location: Moscow,
Registered: 8 Dec 2004
|
|
Prev
